No Dead Animals - Tsunami

Suggesting that animals do have a sixth sense! I saw on a program yesterday, one of those 'wild life show' guys explain'd it. Dolphins have a magnetic sensor and they flee... it alerts the fish who in turn FLEE.. the birds above can see the commotion.. and FLEE. Land animals clue in to the bird activity and run for safety. It is trully amazing in all the debree and death they are finding from the Tsunami... so very little if any wild life carcus. I have always believed animals have a 6th sense.. and how odd that it seems to start with magnetism... the earth communicating... (suggests aether to me)

Zero Point Energy

Quantum mechanics has discovered the existence of an all

pervading energy embedded within the fabric of space, the

zero-point energy. About thirty years after the Michelson

and Morley experiment failed to detect the aether/ether,

it was recognized that a term was needed in the equations

of quantum mechanics in order for them to correctly describe

experimental results. The term described an inherent, electrically

energetic fluctuation interacting with all systems, even in the

total absence of mass, radiation or heat. Zero-point refers to a

temperature of absolute zeto degrees Kelvin and means that the

fluctuations are not thermal in nature. The zero-point fluctuations

at first presented an embarrassing situation their energy density

was infinite. Mathematical procedures called renormalization were

devised for quantum mechanical calculations to remove this infinite

zero-point energy to yield the finite masses and fields that we

observe. A new and even more promising approach to modeling the

zero-point energy may arise from superstring theories which unify

all the forces of nature. Recent experiments have shown that the

zero-point energy is unaffected by the presence of absorbers and

reflectors. This implies that the energy does not propagate in our

three-dimensional space. Where does it come from? (physicists suggest

the following::worm holes, black holes, & energy sources outside

our 3-dimension space-time)



When you look at the grid of space/time, it is smooth. All that we

observe appears 'smooth' And yet on the microscopic level.. empty

space is vibrating violently.The action of the zero-point

fluctuations results from an electric flux orthogonally

passing trough our three-dimensional space.  Jitter in this flux,

aligned with our three-space, gives rise to a turbulence of

microscopic white holes (electric flux entering) and black holes

(flux leaving) that are constantly pair-forming and pair-annihilating.

These holes are on the order of 10x-33cm(esto es 10 a la -33

potencia) and the resulting turbulence gives the fabric of space a

dynamic foam-like structure sometimes called the quantum foam.



Visualizing this turbulent grid,on the microscopic level.. then

visualize the smooth space/time grid, and  you come to realize that our

dimension has been 'enlarged' and if/when empty space is enlarged...

it too will cease to be turbulent, and be observable to us..ie 'smooth'.

When and where will we learn to tap in to this energy source?  What on

Earth will we be able to do then?

Check this out...

I saw a fabulous special on PBS, the Elegant Universe by Brian Greene, just the other night. I was on the edge of my seat.. completely intoxicated. It made everything so much clearer to me.. it is the most exciting thing to consider where the world is headed in the very new future with the cutting edge discoveries in quantum physics. (the Aether is coming!!!!)

Aside from this... I want to wish anyone who views my blog today.. a Very Merry Christmas!

Corruption

I was given a link to surf in here, and while reading, I got to thinking. [Thats a good thing btw ;-) ] Here's what I ponder'd:

Everything that is of good report has a tendency to find corruption(like the effect Christmas treats have on my figure!). Ancient Temples are another good example of this. At one time it was a place where scholars gathered to share and discuss knowlege of math, the cosmos and philosphy. As knowlege became diverse and debateable, Universities and churches were born. Temples were once a place where taxes/tithes were paid/offered, money exchanged hands, loans were issued... we now have banking institutions for this. Temples were a place where disputes were settled, and contracts made. We now have the courts to govern such things. The poor, the travel'd, the sick and afflicted, found comfort and refuge in the temples. W we have welfare, motels, and hospitals to provide such aid now. Not only corruption motivated the branching.. but necessity as populations increased. The scripture that tells us "there must needs be opposition in all things" takes my mind directly to the quantum realm of positive and negative charges wich keep energy and new life in motion... or stops it.

Temples were a place where baptisms, covenant marriages, blessings and sacred ordinances were performed. This remains the function in Temples where they exsist today. Idealy, it is those things still held sacred that persist in the Temples. One hopes that that couldn't be corrupt, so a question of authority comes to mind. By what authority are these ordinances performed?

Is it not then our objective or responsibility, to sift thru the charges that surround us, finding that wich lifts us in the cosmos? With all the information, ideas, philosphies and corruption "out there", some of it so ancient, how does one "know" the truth? I believe we can "feel" our way thru alot of it, and when/where we can't, how great is it that we can REASON!?! I value knowlege. I value truth. As Descarte is famous for coining..."I think, therefore I am." Forever in persuit of truth.

WTF Do We Know?

I checked some 'critical' reviews of the film "What the Bleep Do We Know" before going to see it last night. One made it sound anti-religion, where science tends to lean at times, the other promised a basic understanding of quantum physics and how it seemlessly fits together. Ideas of Superposition, direction of time, neuro science, hologrpahics, observer theories and subatomic levels of electrons effect on properties ..were all 'presented', and cleverly animated with cutting edge technology.

While I found the film entertaining and also thought provoking, I realize the theories discussed are presently under debate and investigation in the world of physics, so, not by any means final. The film was actually quite spiritual in nature and I wasn't expecting that. Where it did not 'disagree' with my own Faith, some of it seem'd over the top to me.

Many credible physicists, radiologists, psychologists, Doctors and even a theologist were interview'd and credit'd. It made 'sense', however, one red flag for me was 'Ramtha" aka JZ Knight, who seem'd to be combining scientific findings with her new age twists of spirituality, wich is fine. There are different ways to experience spirituality.

Nothing in me was offended or shaken. I recognized some truths in it, while other things made me narrow my brow and wonder. The whole power of thought effecting water thing was grossly incomplete. I didn't get that. So this is my 'review'... I scanned the room taking note of my peers. Half of them were earthy student types with notebooks, the other half seem'd to be mid to later life couples. They all looked like 'thinkers' to me. I'm glad I went, it was worthy of my consideration.

I'll keep reading my books though. :-) If you've seen, or want to see it I'd like to hear what you think so please comment?

DaVinci-Physics

Some time ago I read the book The DaVinci Code it is a wonderful read! Dan Brown set out to disprove some of the myths pointed out in a book called The Templar Revelation. What happened instead he says, "I became a believer". Yesterday I got my movies (my job) and in them was the documentary "Cracking the DaVinci Code". Dan Brown, the author of DaVinci Code is interview'd and says this: "Two Thousand years ago we lived in a world of God's and Godess's. Now in a male dominated society we have a long history of violence and bloodshed. I have come to accept that Science and Religion are partners. They are simply two different languages attempting to tell the same story. Both are manifestations of man's quest to understand the divine. While Science deals on the answers, Religion savors the questions."

DaVinci's paintings were analyzed discuss'd in the documentary. The man was no Christian but what WAS he trying to say in those paintings?

If you have not read the book, breifly, it unviels some of the 'cover ups' in religious history. It sent me on a mission studying the inquisitions, the Knights Tempar, Sacred Geometry, the Gnostics and led me to Particle and Astro-Physics. I don't subscribe to hocus pocus, I want to know the truth. I want credible sources. I find all of this profoundly fascinating.

Tonight, in my hometown, a documentary is playing. I'm going to see it! It's called "What the *bleep Do We Know?" It's about Strings.. physics and the like. Should be interesting!

My Blogging Superposition

This post inspired by meinfaust. In the case of Schrodinger's Cat I contemplate at wich superposition I am presently positioned in the blogosphere. I know SOMEONE is reading this... actually I know of three people reading this... and yet my hits are greater than that amount of traffic. So I am not invisible.... yet nor am I infamous. I am superpositioned between the two. As I am consistantly observing...I am not younge, yet I am not old. A friend of mine often asks, how many hairs does a guy have to loose before you start calling him 'bald' ? I'm not loosing hairs but I'm trying to loose 10 lbs. It rarely happens all at once. How many lbs lost will make you.. 'thin' orrender you.. 'still fat'? That is easily taken too far in both directions. Because really does an extra 10 really make you "fat"? But 10 can effortlessly turn to 20.. then to 30 and HELLO! Consider this, how many books do you have to read before you are 'well read'? At what point do you KNOW what you are talking about? We are superimposed works in progress. Just keep progressing your being! ;-)

Shopping for Links!

If you have a blog that is of the same nature or interest as mine, leave me a comment and
perhaps we can link to eachother? I will be posting about cutting edge science, the creation, dinosaurs, Faith, old science/old faith, and so on as it grabs my interest. I would love to find others who think about the same things to ignite my own considerations and study.

Haloscan commenting and trackback have been added to this blog.

I Believe....

I believe as Science has taught us, that matter cannot be distroyed and is therefore eternal. I also believe as my Faith has taught me, that intelligence is eternal.. it was neither created nor can it be destroyed. Although the cosmic ingredients of intelligence and element are eternal and cannot be destroyed, they CAN be organized. I believe that we started as intelligences unorganized and were then fused by the hand of God with element as all living things have been. We are as immortal and coequal in duration with God himself. Even Plato taught that "God desired that all things should be good and nothing bad, so far as this was attainable.. for wich reason, when he was framing the universe, he put intelligence in soul, and soul in body."

The three parts of man include, the germ of eternal intelligence, then fused with spirit element (an element that has yet to be observed by man) and then fused with body wich is completely observable to man.


I believe that intelligences are not only self knowing, they can communicate with one another thru the aetherical ocean in the NOT so empty space in our observable dimension.(This has been confirmed repeatedly in studies of the vacuum. Instead of finding 'nothing' physicists who specialize in quantum mechanics have discovered an astonishing variety of radiation, 'virtual particles' (wich aren't as imaginary as their names suggests), and in it, extraordinary - even violent- activity in the very place where we would otherwise expect 'nothing' at all. Each intelligence not only knows it exists and broadcasts what it is but it can also observe, remember, imagine, idealize and design. Most importantly is an the innate capacity to be enlarged. To be enlarged it needs the hand of God, whom I believe exsists WITHIN this universe, and therefore enlarges an intelligence in THIS universe) By enlarge I mean entering and experiencing this dimension and growing within it.

The Lord doesn't want this creative power to be a secret at all. He has repeatedly revealed it to his prophets. The problem is, we aren't always recognizing or listening to them eh? The scriptures are full of astronomical even scientific inferences. He has enlightened man with the capacity to observe, recollect knowlege... to imagine, test and prove that we might understand it.

Total infusion of intelligence into element is called a "kingdom" God says he has kingdoms without number. Scientists have given names to oranized kingdoms operating within the bounds the Lord has set for each one. Examples are 'subatomic particles' 'atoms' 'molecules' 'cells' 'plants' 'animals' and 'human beings'. God can preciesely measure an intelligence's capacity for obedience. This will reveal an intelligences fundamental response to eternal laws wich are indispensable for the maintenance of order. It is then governed by that law wich it WILL obey. This can also be stated that an intelligence chooses it's 'level' of exsistence before it is placed in any sphere in wich it will reside in our observable universe.

The most impressive scientific observation about the visible universe is the order that pervades each organized echelon of matter. The Lord has explained, the first law of heaven is not order - it is obedience. Order is the result. If that makes you feel 'unfree' realize that He also said "That which is governed by law is also preserved by law and perfected and sanctified by the same." (D&C 88:34) And this is supported by the realization that any degree of force imposed upon an intelligence's agency introduces into that organized kingdom the seeds of civil war, revolution and cosmic dissolution. Therefore the first rule of creation is that the universe must be built by voluntary participation. And as the universe seems to obey... human beings seem to have been given even more liberty within the sphere their "obedience" eh? This also suggests we have a greater capacity for enlargement.

I wanted to post some of my belief in this blog along with the Science I am studying, because that is what this blog is about. Putting those things together. So far, I have not seen them disagree. Science itself relies on a degree of faith, for it is the unseen it hopes to uncover. It is thier faith that motivates them to action, and their action, or experiements that increase their knowlege and/or enlargement.

My conclusion... Intelligence in matter. THIS is God's secret power of creation.

Self Organization or God?

I just finished my book on Quantum Gravity by Lee Smolin. And I loved it! He started his book off by stating the principle that "there is nothing outside the universe" all of his points throughout the book support that running statement. His last chapter however is relative to my running statement (see title summary of this blog) that "Truth is truth, in Science AND in understanding God...anything false will fail and these truths will merge into one truth." That being said I'll summarize the points he made in the last chapter that inspire this post.

He is telling us that String Theory did not turn out to be unique. There are too many different string theories for it to be THE answer. "So most people who work with string theory now believe the M theory conjecture" (a theory unifying the collective string theories). He asks the question: "What or Who chose which consistent theory applies to our world?" (I think he is playing devils advocate when he suggests that needing one 'right' string theory that seems 'unfindable' points us 'outside' the universe)

"There seems to be only one possible answer to this question. Something external to the universe made the choice. If thats the way things turn out, then this is the exact point at which science will become religion. Or to put it better it will then be rational to use science as an argument for RELIGION." (since religion can be so diverse.. I am going to correct him if I may be so bold.. and exchange his last word with 'understanding the nature of God')

"For a universe to exist for billions of years and contain the ingredients for life, certain special conditions must be satisfied: the masses of the elementary particles and the strengths of the fundamental forces must be tuned to values very close to the ones actually we observe. If these parameters are outside certain narrow limits, the universe will be inhospitable to life. This raises a legitimate scientific question: given that there seem to be more than one possible consistent set of laws, why is it that the laws of nature are such that the parameters fall within the narrow ranges needed for life? We may call this the anthropic question.

If there are different possible consistent laws of nature, but no framework which unifies them, then there are only two possible answers to the anthropic question. The first is that we are very lucky indeed. The second is that whatever entity specified the laws did so in order that there would be life. In this version of an argument which is well know to theologians the God of the Gaps argument. If science raises a question like the anthropic question that cannot be answered in terms of processes that obey the laws of nature, it becomes rational to invoke an outside agency such as God. The scientific version of this argument is called the strong anthropic principle.

Notice this argument is valid only if there is no way to explain how the laws of nature might have been chosen except by invoking the action of some entity outside our universe. You may recall the principle with which I started this book: that there is nothing outside the universe."

Now he expains the possibility if M theory is the answer. He says it is 'like' the other possibility with an important difference. If the different string theories describe different phases of a single theory, then it is possible that under the right circumstances there could be a transition from one phase to another. Just as ice melts to water, the universe could 'melt' from one phase, in which it is described by one sthory, to another phase in which it is described by another...." (okay I get that it makes sense, and yet as it takes energy to melt ice to water it may take God, or God's 'invoked energy' to melt us from one phase to another.) " ...in this picture the universe is allowed to have changed phase as it evolved in time. There is also the possibility that different regions of the universe exist in different phases.....there are at least two alternatives to the God of Gaps argument. The first is that there is some process that creates many universes....The big bang is then not the origin of all that exists, but only a kind of phase transition by which a new region of space and time was created, in a phase different than the one from which it came, and then cooled and expanced. In such a scenario there could be many big bangs, leading to many universes." (again...consider the possibility that God himself invokes these phase changes.. then you can imagine a premortal life as a phase... the creation of the 'world/universe' another... and 'life' entering it, like seeds scattered upon a landscape... each particle/seed producing within that sphere in wich it was created and then evolving as far as it can within that sphere.. in harmony with the fact that many particles attract and combine with other particles to make new particles, again within it's sphere to do so. also ....any universes helps us to imagine a God of Worlds without number) *that sphere talk may only make sense to Ar as we have discuss'd it before and I am suspicious that he is the only one who reads this particular blog ;-)

"The only problem with this kind of explanation is that it is difficult to see how it could be refuted... a theory that cannot be refuted cannot really be part of science.

Is it possible to have a theory which gives a scientific answer to the anthropic quesiton? Such a theory may be framed around the possibility that the universe can make a physical transition from one phase to another. If we could look back inot the history of the universe to before the big bang, it may be that we would see one or a whole succession of different phases in which the universe had different dimensions and appeared to satisfy different laws. The big bang would then be just the most recent of a series of transitions the universe has passed through. And even though each phase may be governed by a different string theory, the whole history of the universe would be governed by a different single law -M theory. We then need an explanation in physical terms for why the universe 'chose' to exist in a phase such as the one in which we find ourselves, which exists for billions of years and is hospitable for life.......

one idea is that new universes could form inside black holes. This also means that the laws in the universe from which ours was formed were not very different from those of our own.....We can then ask whether this prediction is stisfied by our universe. To cut a long story short, up to the present time it seems that it is. The reason is that carbon chemistry is not only good for life, it plays an important role in the processes that make the massive stars that end up as black holes."

He lists the estimated monumental improbabilites that everything would emerge the way it has, and then states: "Whichever way we make the estimate, we conclude that if space really has a discrete atomic structure, then it is extraordinarily improbable that it would have the completely smooth and regular arrangement we observe it to have. If the explanation is not to be that some outside agency chose the state of the universe, there must have been some mechanism of self-organization that , acting in our past drove the world into this incredibly improbable state... One solution which has been proposed is called inflation.. This is a mechanism by which the universe can blow itself up exponentially fast until it becomes the flat almost euclidean universe we observe today. ...inflation may be part of the answer, but it cannot be the complete answer..... if we are to avoid an appeal to religion, then this is a question that must have an answer......" (I believe it needs an answer so we can better understand God, and of course the world we live in.)

"So in the end, the most improbable and hence the most puzzling aspect of space is it's very existence....The great triumph of the quantum theory of gravity may be that it will explain to us why this is so. If it does not, then the mystic who said God is all around us will turn out to have been right." (and comments like this may very well be what has religious people believing that Science tries to explain AWAY God...or that they find us silly and/or 'mystical'... Just as Science is rediscovering and better understanding the Aether that exsists in empty space.... I am hopeful that some of us will rediscover,